E-book reader (per book, amortized over 50 books)
E-kirjanlukija (per kirja, jaettuna 50 kirjalle)
Carbon based on multiple LCA studies but device generation matters. Water and toxicity poorly documented for consumer electronics.
Environmental impact of an e-reader (e.g. Kindle) amortized over 50 books. Manufacturing produces ~168 kg CO₂e, making each book ~3.4 kg CO₂e.
How was this number determined?
The Truecost score is calculated from absolute physical values. Each row below shows the measured value, how it was normalized, and where it comes from.
| Dimension | Absolute value | Score 100 = | Normalized | Weight | Weighted | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Emissions | 3.36 kg CO₂e | 9.5 kg CO₂e | 35.37 | ×0.35 | 12.38 | MEDIUM |
| Water Consumption | 6.0 liters | 3840 liters | 0.16 | ×0.2 | 0.03 | LOW |
| Land Use | 0.0 m²·year | 51 m²·year | 0.0 | ×0.2 | 0.00 | HIGH |
| Waste | 0.004 kg | 5 kg | 0.08 | ×0.15 | 0.01 | MEDIUM |
| Toxicity | 6.0 µDALY | 162 µDALY | 3.7 | ×0.1 | 0.37 | LOW |
| Truecost score (weighted sum) | 12.8 | |||||
Share of your annual planetary budget
Where do the absolute values come from?
- Cleantech Group (2009): The Environmental Impact of Amazon's Kindle
- Borggren et al. (2011): LCA of e-paper systems — Nordic Workshop on LCA
- Achachlouei & Moberg (2015): Life cycle assessment of e-books vs paper books — Journal of Industrial Ecology
168 kg is from 2009 study on Kindle 1. Modern Kindle Paperwhite may be lower (~100-120 kg) due to efficiency gains. Range per book: 2.0-3.4 kg depending on device generation and total books read.
- Cleantech Group (2009): The Environmental Impact of Amazon's Kindle
Water data for electronics manufacturing is sparse. Semiconductor fabrication is water-intensive but poorly documented per consumer device.
No significant land use per book.
- UN Global E-waste Monitor (2024): Electronic waste statistics
E-waste recycling rate very low. Contains lithium, cobalt, rare earths.
- Wäger et al. (2011): Environmental and health impacts of e-waste — Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Toxicity from e-waste extremely difficult to quantify. Depends entirely on disposal method and location.
Comparisons
- Per book about 2x the carbon footprint of a printed book (3.4 vs 1.5 kg CO₂e)
- After 50 books the reader starts paying off — but only if it actually replaces printed books
- E-reader electronic waste is a bigger issue than paper recycling
Methodology
Based on Cleantech Group (2009) Kindle LCA and subsequent academic studies. Device lifecycle emissions divided by 50 books (moderate reader over 3-4 year device life). Break-even vs printed books occurs at approximately 20-30 books.
Sources
- Cleantech Group (2009): The Environmental Impact of Amazon's Kindle
- Achachlouei & Moberg (2015): Life cycle assessment of e-books vs paper books — Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Borggren et al. (2011): LCA of e-paper systems
- UN Global E-waste Monitor (2024)